Custom Search

Monday, November 2, 2009

Potential Global Sourcing Gains

In a nutshell, companies source globally to differentiate their products, gain competitive advantage with reduced price points, and realize margin improvements. On average, many contemporary analyst studies, surveys, benchmarking reports, and so on, have concluded that a well-devised and well-executed sourcing strategy can produce margin improvements up to 2 percent (through a more efficient trading partner collaboration); reduced cycle times by up to 30 percent; up to 5 percent in reduction to the cost of goods sold (COGS); and up to a 15 percent increase in gross margin (through increased international sourcing on low labor and supply costs from East and Southeast Asia, Eastern Europe, and South America). Sure, expectations are usually much higher than these figures, since initial savings may provide false gains. And with many costs and risks being hidden (such as logistics complexity and increased lead time ramifications), one should always take a long-term view and analysis. For more information, see Understanding the True Cost of Sourcing.

What also contributes to the popularity of global sourcing today might be the fact that for years, only larger companies had the wherewithal to operate complex and pricey import/export software systems. Today's technology, conversely, has leveled the playing field for international trade, given that inexpensive Web-based systems—designed for simplicity and more easily deployed—can now enable much smaller companies to engage in global sourcing with a wide range of suppliers. The unstoppable march of the Internet and the growth of online shopping and other transactions mean that we are all operating in a new electronic real-time world (the global village), with inherent visibility into important events. These new systems make it possible for a small retail company to engage even just once—opportunistically if needed (as in a "one and done" manner)—with a supplier, to still record a profitable and efficient transaction. This has brought about what some experts call the "great leap" in global sourcing: it is no longer the privilege of only a few humongous and mighty companies, but is becoming a viable strategy for almost any company.

In addition, trading quotas and other barriers have been disappearing (or are being reduced) globally, while the expansion of the European Union (EU) eastwards opens up potential new sourcing countries along with new potential markets. With the end of apparel import quotas, this sector is growing rapidly in India and the Far East, while the passage of the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) promises to bring additional activity into Central America as well. Today, on average, retailers are consequently following the top executive mandates to increase imports (of both raw materials and finished goods), even up to a quarter of total purchases (from a current level of 5 to 12 percent).

There is also a growing trend towards offering private labels or brands, and a consequent fundamental reassessment of the structure of global sourcing. In other words, the question now is whether to use agents or other middlemen at all, if via Internet trading exchanges (and the like) companies can now increasingly work directly with manufacturers. Therefore, given some reported examples of success with lower-priced house brands, retailers in several segments, including fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG), consumer electronics, and apparel, are increasing their focus on private-label merchandise to take advantage of margin improvements, improved quality consistency, and brand loyalty. For more information, see The Fragile Consumer Packaged Goods Market and Private Label Products and A Unique Product Lifecycle Management Tool for Private Label Retail.

No comments:

Post a Comment